sitemap - feedback

 

Ideas of Order

Posted on: Thursday, May 04, 2017

 
In the beginning was the closed eye, and so it will be in the end. In here happens all that will happen. In here all things are made that are made.
(from The Lore of the Ancestors)
– Máighréad Medbh(1)
 
I might have said the long wink. Is that what the “Word” is—nod and wink to each other, a precious secret code in our species’ stand against the vagaries of the World/Whirl?

Time and time again Fitzsimons's foreboding landscapes feature paths or roads that lead the eye to an ambiguous, dark destination, possibly a scene of war or environmental catastrophe. In each piece the artist deliberately distorts and blurs this distant space; the haze and confusion creating a sense of uncertainty and, in turn, anxiety at the viewer's inability to decipher what it is that lies ahead....

– Paula Clarke, March 2017(2)

Encountering John Fitzsimon’s paintings in the Olivier Cornet Gallery(3) set me thinking about what we mean when we say “order.” Well no. I doubt if his paintings would have set me thinking on those lines, if the following quote hadn’t been prominently displayed:
Fitzsimons's 2012 collection, “Pyramid,” showcased an artist exuding confidence and self-assuredness. Sharp, geometric lines merged to form harmonious, triangular patterns which boasted bold, vivid blocks of primary colours. This was Fitzsimons's personal homage to the “golden age” of Egyptian civilisation whereby “equality, balance and peace” were at the centre of society. Of that collection Fitzsimons spoke of his intention to recreate this clarity and harmony in his work. At the time Fitzsimons was taken with an observation made by the Egyptologist Dr Carmen Boulter who remarked that the Egyptians would most certainly have viewed society today as a “Dark Age.”
– Paula Clarke, essay, “Projections.”(4)

We constantly get this kind of commentary beside exhibited paintings. Could we have it as an optional extra after viewing? I was having a very strong sensual and instinctual response to the paintings, that was fragmented by this piece of information. Is it information? Perhaps in the sense that it intrudes something into the formation of my experience, yes, but does it describe verifiable detail? I believe that John Fitzsimons is concerned about the stability of society, and that he has adopted the notion of order as a creative subject matter. I do not believe that Egypt was so extraordinarily perfect that we should “pay homage” to it. I don’t understand the fine points of Fitzsimons’s practice, but it seems to me that his work would be an impressive experience without any knowledge of his motivations. The thought that motivates is never the thought that manifests, if the artist allows his or her tools to be fully part of the process: tools include limbs, senses, inner organs, personal history and geography. (And I must admit here that I'm guilty myself of the Author's Note, which I must address.)

So, now I must get over all these moral matters in order to meet the paintings on their own terms. I’d be much more interested in how he stood or sat while painting, what thoughts arose as he grew that yellow meadow, how he primed the canvas or mixed the colours. I can make my own metaphors. As for ancient Egypt (pre-Roman), about which I know very little, I understand that the society was pyramidal, by which I understand that there was no social mobility. Apparently, for a very long time (maybe 5,000 years), there were few, if any revolts, hence the notion of social orderliness. The society created extraordinary works of architecture and the famous Library of Alexandria. The great pyramids were not built by slaves, it seems, contrary to Herodotus’ account, but by respected labourers, who were devoted to the pharaohs, well-fed, and given honourable burial close to their divine masters and mistresses. There were slaves, but they were prisoners-of-war, and worked in households, mines or quarries.(5)

Might an era of strict social definitions with a clear general understanding of expectations and rewards be considered a “Bright Age”? Scientists tell us that memory generally constructs the past as better than the present, and that the workers had a tough life building the tombs they believed were portals to immortality for their walking gods. Was the social “order” in any way connected with the illiteracy of the lower classes?
Be a scribe for he is in control of everything; he who works in writing is not taxed, nor does he have to pay any dues. (6)
Does he who rules the Word rule the World?
Oh! Blessed rage for order, pale Ramon,
The maker’s rage to order words of the sea,
Words of the fragrant portals, dimly-starred,
And of ourselves and of our origins,
In ghostlier demarcations, keener sounds.
– Wallace Stevens(7)
Is the Word our highest idea of order?
“…when she sang, the sea,
Whatever self it had, became the self
That was her song.”
– Ibid.
It didn’t of course. It was still its own self. She had only claimed it as part of the human conceptual universe, as the pharaohs claimed supremacy by proclaiming their divinity (supported by the scribes). Establish a central idea as inviolable and order follows. C. S. Lewis asserted that it’s Logos, not the Word, that centralises. Accusing Jean de Meun of clumsiness in La Roman de la Rose, he says:
“Unity in diversity if possible—failing that, mere unity, as a second best—these are the norms for all human work, given, not by the ancients, but by the nature of consciousness itself.” (8)
Hegel said that love is the mind’s notion of unity. So, love = order, which may elucidate Fitzsimon’s equation—Ancient Egypt not being actual Ancient Egypt, but a portmanteau that symbolizes order. Perhaps what good artists do is what Lewis prescribes—provide diversity and contradiction, revolt also, anchored by an idea of order, some apperceptible unity. Their explanations are beside the point.

GENESIS
(from The Lore of the Ancestors)

“A solitary stone is a weak one, prone to obsolescence worse than death.
And so the Great Crush decreed unity, amalgamation. To be annexed
by the march of empire is to be forever famed and tasting the breadth
of immortality. Little becomes great in the large; morpheme to lexicon.
What was pulverised in shale becomes restored, a crystal resurrection.
Behold the elevation of quartz, the ultimate golding of pyrite,
the redeployment of sheet silicates. Mica’s crushed rebellion
morphs to glory, reforged in the indurated logic of the new light.

Agelast was born of this unitary spirit, slow-thinking in a closed fire.
All that made it is preserved within the streets and towers, breathing
history through every captured stroke of colour. Listen to the gray choir
in its utter harmony, each tone precise, contained, interleafing.
The citizens are offspring, not architects. They come as atoms do,
incognisant. It is the same breath, now hot, now close, now cold,
that transfigured shale to slate, slate to city, city to its variegated crew.
Agelast, self-conceiving, self-involved, is its own immanent god.”

– Máighréad Medbh, from Parvit of Agelast
 

-------------------------------------------------------------

Footnotes

(1) Parvit of Agelast. Dublin: Arlen House, 2016
(2) Extract from an essay on John Fitzsimons' “Projections”. Full essay here.
(3) Olivier Cornet Gallery website
(4) http://www.oliviercornetgallery.com/#/exhibitions-projections/4593651668
(5) “Great Pyramid tombs unearth 'proof' workers were not slaves”. The Guardian.
(6) A proverb taught in ancient Egyptian schools, according to Douglas J. Brewer & Emily Teeter, of the University of Illinois, Urbana, and Oriental Institute Museum, University of Chicago. http://fathom.lib.uchicago.edu/2/21701778/
(7) “The Idea of Order at Key West”, Selected Poems. London: Faber and Faber, 1993.
(8) The Allegory of Love. New York: Oxford University Press, 1958, 141.

 

 


Other recent blog items

Blue Arrow Ideas of Order
  Posted on: Thursday, May 04, 2017
Blue Arrow Dark Reading (Roethke)
  Posted on: Saturday, April 01, 2017
Blue Arrow Mutatis Mutandis: A Reading of 'The Disquieting Muses' by Sylvia Plath
  Posted on: Thursday, March 02, 2017
Blue Arrow Perplexing Pronomials: Tales of the Koanan #5
  Posted on: Friday, February 03, 2017
Blue Arrow Aerial Approach / Pre-text
  Posted on: Thursday, January 05, 2017
Blue Arrow Walking with Ammons and Carson
  Posted on: Friday, December 02, 2016
Blue Arrow Face the Wall (fragments)
  Posted on: Sunday, November 06, 2016
Blue Arrow Blog October 2016: Product
  Posted on: Sunday, October 02, 2016
Blue Arrow The Eye that Primes the Canvas
  Posted on: Friday, September 02, 2016
Blue Arrow Escape: Parvit of Agelast
  Posted on: Sunday, August 07, 2016
Blue Arrow No
  Posted on: Friday, July 01, 2016
Blue Arrow A Reading of 'Indoors' by Eavan Boland
  Posted on: Wednesday, June 01, 2016
Blue Arrow The Look: A Reading of 'The Lioness' by Adrienne Rich
  Posted on: Sunday, May 01, 2016
Blue Arrow The Dental Contract
  Posted on: Friday, April 01, 2016
Blue Arrow A Reading of Michael Hartnett's 'Epitaph for John Kelly, Blacksmith'
  Posted on: Wednesday, March 02, 2016
Blue Arrow A Reading of Medbh McGuckian’s ‘Sidereum Iter (His Journey through the Stars)’
  Posted on: Sunday, January 31, 2016
Blue Arrow Farewell to the Blog
  Posted on: Tuesday, July 28, 2015
Blue Arrow An Old Fragment
  Posted on: Saturday, June 27, 2015
Blue Arrow Private
  Posted on: Tuesday, May 26, 2015
Blue Arrow Architectonics
  Posted on: Tuesday, April 28, 2015
Blue Arrow Score
  Posted on: Friday, March 27, 2015
Blue Arrow Armoire
  Posted on: Saturday, February 28, 2015
Blue Arrow Undoing Peace (Lives of the Koanan #4)
  Posted on: Monday, January 26, 2015
Blue Arrow Like One More Wave
  Posted on: Saturday, November 29, 2014
Blue Arrow Beasts, Priests and Virgins: Dylan Thomas and the Love Concept
  Posted on: Sunday, October 26, 2014
Blue Arrow Sane
  Posted on: Saturday, September 27, 2014
Blue Arrow A Girl is a Sliced Fruit
  Posted on: Wednesday, August 27, 2014
Blue Arrow Peace (Lives of the Koanan #3)
  Posted on: Sunday, July 27, 2014
Blue Arrow Shit
  Posted on: Friday, June 27, 2014
Blue Arrow Expressing the Source: Eavan Boland and Adrienne Rich
  Posted on: Monday, May 26, 2014
Blue Arrow A Little Smaller than the Entire Universe
  Posted on: Sunday, April 27, 2014
Blue Arrow Fronts (Lives of the Koanan #2)
  Posted on: Monday, March 31, 2014
Blue Arrow Act
  Posted on: Thursday, February 27, 2014
Blue Arrow Present and Unaccounted For
  Posted on: Monday, January 27, 2014
Blue Arrow Xs
  Posted on: Thursday, November 28, 2013
Blue Arrow Pleasure
  Posted on: Sunday, October 27, 2013
Blue Arrow Amateur
  Posted on: Friday, September 27, 2013
Blue Arrow Wasted Time
  Posted on: Tuesday, August 27, 2013
Blue Arrow Apathy
  Posted on: Friday, July 26, 2013
Blue Arrow A Kinder Time
  Posted on: Thursday, June 27, 2013
Blue Arrow Where Spirituality Lies
  Posted on: Monday, May 27, 2013
Blue Arrow Firmament or Fear?
  Posted on: Monday, April 29, 2013
Blue Arrow The Curse of the Gab
  Posted on: Friday, March 29, 2013
Blue Arrow Savage Solitude?
  Posted on: Friday, March 01, 2013
Blue Arrow Aphorism Art and Craft
  Posted on: Monday, January 28, 2013
Blue Arrow Choice (Lives of the Koanan #1)
  Posted on: Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Blue Arrow The Embodied Text
  Posted on: Sunday, November 25, 2012
Blue Arrow Styling the Self
  Posted on: Monday, October 22, 2012
Blue Arrow Free and Uneasy
  Posted on: Sunday, September 23, 2012
Blue Arrow The Feels of Silence
  Posted on: Tuesday, August 21, 2012
Blue Arrow A Place of Beauty
  Posted on: Monday, July 23, 2012
Blue Arrow Stance
  Posted on: Sunday, June 24, 2012
Blue Arrow All in the Body
  Posted on: Friday, May 25, 2012
Blue Arrow Emotional Luxuries
  Posted on: Tuesday, April 24, 2012
Blue Arrow The Art of Attention
  Posted on: Friday, March 23, 2012
Blue Arrow Where's My Hat?
  Posted on: Friday, February 24, 2012
Blue Arrow Yellow Woman
  Posted on: Thursday, January 26, 2012